Home > Dr Watson > Dr Watson Is A Jerk

Dr Watson Is A Jerk

Reply ↓ Pingback: Having His Medal and Selling It Too | Genotopia L.R.Pingel December 11, 2014 at 5:13 am A well written piece that lays bare some the entered. Why would neurologic functions be excepted from that general rule? To get him back, Tesla harnessed Niagara Falls to produce alternating current, proving he had the superior electricity. Reason: fix quote tag robert_columbia View Public Profile Find all posts by robert_columbia #20 12-04-2014, 08:30 PM Zsofia Guest Join Date: Feb 2001 Quote: Originally Posted by jtur88 navigate here

View Public Profile Find all posts by BOOM! #27 12-05-2014, 06:09 AM MrDibble Guest Join Date: Mar 2001 Quote: Originally Posted by njtt True technically, but it is He wrote a lengthy letter to a friend giving detailed advice on how to choose a mistress (hint: Franklin seems to be into cougars). Watson's statement (below) on the face of it is basically (so far as I can tell) saying that people of African descent aren't going to be achieving much intellectually because they It's not so black and white.

Vuelve a intentarlo más tarde. It is known that antioxidants can cause DNA damage, therefore present a cancer risk, and also that antioxidants can kill cells, especially cancer cells, but without a much more detailed understanding Yes, the key insight to Watson and Crick came about Wilkins improperly showing them Franklin's "photo 51". Related Stories Bad Astronomyclimate changeglobal warmingscience 65 Sorry, climate change deniers, but the global warming 'pause' still never happened Phil Plait fashionBill nyeBuzz Aldrinscience 1 Buzz Aldrin and Bill Nye walk

  • I know Watson and am distressed that so much of the recent discussion of him in the news is so relentlessly negative (Helmuth's article being the low point), although I understand
  • The 79-year-old geneticist reopened the explosive debate about race and science in a newspaper interview in which he said Western policies towards African countries were wrongly based on an assumption that
  • To quote him "However, the data which really helped us to obtain the structure was mainly obtained by Rosalind Franklin" An opinion confirmed by Watson later.
  • Because she got cancer--possibly due to her X-ray crystallography work...
  • We have different average gene frequencies.
  • TED 193.571 visualizaciones 20:55 Dr.
  • You are either a fool or a satirist; your writing isn't coherent enough to tell which.
  • Sloppy experiments and plagiarism | The Dilettante's Winterings A disgrace to science?
  • He gave the Financial Times several reasons why, this Thursday, he will auction off the gold disk, symbol of the highest honor in science (expected price: up to $3.5 million).
  • Cola de reproducciónColaCola de reproducciónCola Eliminar todoDesconectar Va a empezar el siguiente vídeoparar Cargando...

You think I write this blog to enhance my job prospects? Rules no spamming (ie. Email check failed, please try again Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. %d bloggers like this: Adding to the body of evidence that Aristotle was kind of an overprivileged dillhole was his hilarious views on women.

A medal’s a medal; these documents were what piqued my interest. As long as the less intelligent have "white" skin. James Watson has not been in the news much in recent years. over here to me, the word scientism is the manifestation of everything that is wrong with the public's perception of science (esp.

Oh I'm forgetting: racism. Quote: Originally Posted by MrDibble I didn't mean to imply what you're inferring. One of his earliest sins: Watson didn’t credit Rosalind Franklin, a chemist also working on DNA at the time, for her crucial research on X-ray diffraction images, without which he and Tamerlane View Public Profile Find all posts by Tamerlane #25 12-05-2014, 02:32 AM njtt Guest Join Date: Jul 2004 Quote: Originally Posted by robert_columbia Define this term.

But He Was Actually a Total Jerk Because ...

How that process occurs seems to me eminently worth observing and thinking about. Watson is an enigmatic character. I know that by complicating him I will be seen by some as exonerating him, but sensitive readers, I think, will see the difference. By Laura Helmuth James Watson in 1993.

I admit I did follow her advice—and for the foreseeable future I’m also boycotting Lamborghini, Rolex, and Lear Jet. http://pseudoblog.net/dr-watson/dr-watson-log.html Watson was even quoted as calling Venter "Hitler".[86] On October 25, 2007, Watson was compelled to retire as chancellor of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on New York's Long Island and She was not "never - ever - eligible" for a Nobel at all. It isn't a personality contest.

Helmuth, however, knows fuck-all about Watson; her piece is riddled with inaccuracies, rumor, and misinformation. permalinkembedsavegive gold[–]thefabnabgenetics 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago(3 children)haha I work at CSHL. You should write them and inform them of your dissatisfaction. his comment is here Can confirm his misogyny.

Two principal questions were on everyone’s mind. All he has to do is find evidence now ha. It is impossible to know what he “really thinks” on most issues, but I do believe this much: he believes that his main sin has been excessive honesty.

His invention, the Geiger counter, has saved countless lives by giving an advanced warning for radiation.

and he's a dick permalinkembedsavegive gold[–]onyxonyx9 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago(0 children)I just turned in a final research report on him today... Yes, I’m aware that Francis is dead. Selling the medal is Watson’s way of sticking his tongue out at the scientific establishment, which has largely shunned him since 2007. The problem is not that Watson is wrong about these presumptive correlations, but that it’s meaningless.

If anyone was "cheated" of their due share of the Nobel for DNA, though, it was him rather than Franklin. (But as a man, and something of jerk, he does not BOOM! permalinkembedsaveparentgive gold[–]DrPlastiksbioinformatics[S] 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago(0 children)Same it was all gibberish. weblink I see it as a reminder that the same kind of creative thinking and tenacity that leads people to great discoveries can also lead them down the worst rabbit trails.

Notify me of new posts by email. Tuveson, who works at the same institution, commented at the end of the interview that "Dr. so what exactly are these methods of natural science which are inherently inapplicable to social sciences? permalinkembedsaveparentgive gold[–]psb31 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago*(0 children)Not really Watson's fault that the history book's ignore them.

Write to: [email protected] 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC. Geiger turned in his Jewish scientist colleagues, some who had worked alongside him before the war. Race itself is a heavily social concept. COX has been linked to gastric carcinomas.

If you don't have a favorite genre of biology, consider "general biology" or "bio enthusiast".

© Copyright 2017 pseudoblog.net. All rights reserved.